Itemize About Books The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception

Title:The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception
Author:Michel Foucault
Book Format:Paperback
Book Edition:Anniversary Edition
Pages:Pages: 240 pages
Published:March 29th 1994 by Vintage (first published 1963)
Categories:Philosophy. History. Nonfiction. Theory. Health. Medicine. Sociology
Online Books The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception Download Free
The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception Paperback | Pages: 240 pages
Rating: 3.98 | 1814 Users | 81 Reviews

Interpretation In Pursuance Of Books The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception

Librarian note: an alternate cover for this edition can be found here.

In the eighteenth century, medicine underwent a mutation. For the first time, medical knowledge took on a precision that had formerly belonged only to mathematics. The body became something that could be mapped. Disease became subject to new rules of classification. And doctors begin to describe phenomena that for centuries had remained below the threshold of the visible and expressible.

In The Birth of the Clinic the philosopher and intellectual historian who may be the true heir to Nietzsche charts this dramatic transformation of medical knowledge. As in his classic Madness and Civilization, Michel Foucault shows how much what we think of as pure science owes to social and cultural attitudes — in this case, to the climate of the French Revolution. Brilliant, provocative, and omnivorously learned, his book sheds new light on the origins of our current notions of health and sickness, life and death.

Present Books During The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception

Original Title: Naissance de la clinique
ISBN: 0679753346 (ISBN13: 9780679753346)
Edition Language: English

Rating About Books The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception
Ratings: 3.98 From 1814 Users | 81 Reviews

Weigh Up About Books The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception
I have a very complicated relationship with this man. He is both my inspiration and subject of intense scrutiny. Foucault is the author that I love to hate and cannot escape. Despite all of the criticism, Foucault is an extremely important philosopher and even if you do not agree with his theoretical position, particularly his concept of decentralized power, his discussion of institutional power and knowledge production is insurmountable. I have read most of Foucault's major works and the Birth

In "Reading Capital" Althusser defines philosophical work as an intervention in science, an exposing of what the object of a science is. "The Birth of the Clinic" is a philosophical work in this sense."The Birth of the Clinic" does not make as clear use of the power/knowledge paradigm that characterizes Foucault's other work. Modern medicine is hardly some absolute, objective science that we, after years of struggling with medieval medicines, happened to stumble upon; but neither was it borne

Well, that was certainly a thrilling ride through the medicine of the ca. 1760s1820s. I wasn't able to read it all at once several tries ended in exhaustion and pretending that the book does not even exist :) I always needed to take a deep breath before diving back into it it's a dense text. Though, I finished the second half in a week and it's been great.I'd recommend to read this book to anyone who wants to use the word science. Yes. The book describes in painful detail everything related to

I knew this book would be like tearing trees apart with your bare hands and it does not disappoint. The whole notion of health hinges on the loss of doctors in the continental wars that raged in Europe pre-Revolution, that left France a land of quackery served on a side plate with a self trained country doctor sandwiches. Standards had to be put in place, and the clinic was born to address this quandary over the health space, where was it? who was authorized to be in it? and what could be done

This short but dense text should be read in conjunction with Discipline and Punish and Madness and Civilization. More specifically, it should probably be read after them, given how complicated and important (as well as "important") it is. Here we have Foucault's account of a series of "scientific revolutions" (although he would not use the term as such) in which the nature of discourse-derived "scientificity" changed for the field of clinical medicine on account of sometimes profound, sometimes

This is one of the most formative books I ever read.

Much as I love love love Discipline and Punish and enjoyed Madness and Civilization, I found this excruciating and tedious. Foucault just bounces all over the place, trying to tie together various observations about space, seeing, family, empiricism and medical reforms with no clear goal or overall project. I loved the strong, accessible style of discipline and punish, but Birth of the Clinic has a really weak, meandering quality to it, maybe because it's one of Foucault's earlier works. Which

Related Post: