Free The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations? Books Online Download
James R. White
Paperback | Pages: 304 pages Rating: 4.34 | 661 Users | 86 Reviews
Identify Epithetical Books The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?
| Title | : | The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations? |
| Author | : | James R. White |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 304 pages |
| Published | : | April 1st 1995 by Bethany House Publishers (first published March 1st 1995) |
| Categories | : | Religion. Theology. Christian. Nonfiction. Christianity |
Interpretation In Favor Of Books The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?
As an Independent Baptist, I have been frustrated for years by the hang up of this particular breed of church on deifying a single, extremely error-ridden and outdated translation of the Bible. Before I knew anything at all, I complained of its cumbersome text; later I found out that everything I had ever heard in defense of the KJV was an outright lie.I was told it was the first translation in English -- but that would be John Wycliffe's Bible, 1380-1400.
I was told it was the first [English] Bible to be popularly available -- but there were 11 complete English Bibles available between 1547-1553, and 31 English New Testaments between 1542-1553.
I was told it was the first [English] Bible supported by the government -- but Matthew's Bible (1537) was printed with royal license and the basis of all later Authorized Versions; Cromwell commissioned The Great Bible of 1539; even Coverdale's had a note reading, "Set forth with the Kynges moost gracious license." (Also, side note, why would the government's approval be something I want? If the American government put its stamp of approval on a translation, I'd be sure to never touch it!)
I was told there had never been another Bible like it before -- but it lifted fully ONE-THIRD of its material straight from Tyndale's 1526. It also copied straight from Coverdale (1535) and the Rheims New Testamen of 1582 (a Catholic vernacular translation).
But then I started coming up against arguments that my background in Jacobean history couldn't solve. I was told that the KJV got its authority from the Textus Receptus -- what was that? Verses and textual issues of translation that I had no background in started surfacing in these arguments, and I needed help. That's when a KJV critic who also happens to be a Baptist posted this video on my Facebook page. I watched James White's succinct argument strip away all the credibility of the "Authorized Version," of the "Textus Receptus," and explain in plain language just what the issues of this controversy are.
This warmly sarcastic bald guy with a book-stuffed office immediately won me over and I began searching for him on Goodreads. As soon as I saw The King James Only Controversy, I knew it was a must-read. I enjoyed every moment of it, and learned a great deal. He is very gentle about the KJV, not looking to offend anyone but simply to explain the truth about Bible translation. In fact, I've now given this book to my KJV-proponent mother because I know his style won't offend her.
Everyone who is interested in apologetics should definitely read this book, no matter what translation you prefer to use. You may ask, why is this even an issue? Or, why should I encourage this issue by reading up on it? White points out that many cultic offshoots such as Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses prefer the KJV, and emphasizes how difficult it is to witness to them using this error-pocked version. Unfortunately, the KJVOers have made this an issue, and a responsible student of God should definitely be acquainted with the argument and its defense.
Itemize Books To The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?
| Original Title: | The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations? |
| ISBN: | 1556615752 (ISBN13: 9781556615757) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Epithetical Books The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?
Ratings: 4.34 From 661 Users | 86 ReviewsArticle Epithetical Books The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?
This is a great resource for any pastor to have, concerning the King James Only (hereafter, KJVO) debate. James White has done a good job addressing this controversy in a matter that is Christ-like and fair, contrary to the attitude seen in the works of some proponents of KJVO. Even before reading the book, I was looking forward to reading on a topic that I know little about, having minimal interaction with it online and in the Marines. Overall, I thought the book was a good example of how oneWhen you have no words to describe how helpful a book has been, perhaps it is best to say that, among all of the non-fiction I have read, this is the first work of non-fiction (aside from the Bible), that I can say gave me that "I can't put this down" feeling. Several days I would walk by, grab it, and get a few pages in where time allowed. Almost every time I stopped, I was sad. Why?Because this book will help you learn more about the transmission of the text of the Bible. Dr. White will show
This has probably been my favourite book to read this year. Whilst it appears to be about a very niche topic (and one that many Christians may be unaware of, even if they will have heard some similar arguments before), the book is very beneficial to all Christians who read the Bible - which is, of course, all Christians.The book's main aim is to show the inaccuracies and inconsistencies of the 'King James Bible Only' advocates' arguments, who claim that the modern translations are not God's
James White does a great job of debunking many outrageous claims made by KJVO advocates. He also paints a great picture of what textual criticism looks like for even the non-scholar to understand. I was a King James Onlyist for some time and struggled greatly with this debate. However after reading this book my struggle was put to rest and I have faith God has preserved His word in other translations than the KJV.
This book is a treasure for the Body of Christ. I personally come from a background involving KJV Only-ism and I can say from personal experience that the KJV only movement is cultish and the beliefs in that community, which I believe to spawn directly from the KJV only stance, are highly destructive and isolationist. James White does Christians a great service in demonstrating just how misguided and incorrect is the view that the KJV alone is the preserved word of God and all other translations
If you want to know how to respond to KJV-only adherents, this is the book to read! The author compares KJV to other new translations, debunking the errant naysayers' claims, by telling exactly what the ancient Greek texts say, most of these texts not being discovered until after 1611. After reading this book, I believe that all pastors should study the Hebrew and Greek languages to better understand what the Bible actually says. In many cases, the newer versions are more accurate than the KJV!
Wow. This book is a must-read. Whether you know anything about the issue or not. White's book is a great intro for textual study.I came from a highly KJVO background, and am still attending a TR Only Christian College. I use the ESV, but could never fully justify my use of it until now. White gives great historical background of textual transmission and translation, as well as a revealing look at the translations done by Erasmus, Stephanus, and Beza for the Textus Receptus. He follows the TR up
0 Comments